Auteur Topic: Oorlog Rusland 3 juni (gelezen 3244 keer)

admin · « **Gepost op:** juni 03, 2016, 12:03:52 pm »

http://europe.liveuamap.com/en/2016/2-june-slogans-of-protestors-in-istanbul-genocidal-fascist

http://europe.liveuamap.com/en/2016/2-june-kharkov-about-100-activists-picketed-the-shopping

http://europe.liveuamap.com/en/2016/2-june-german-police-arrest-three-syrians-over-foiled-is

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/2-june-krasnohorivka-nonstop-shooting

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/2-june-maryinka--heavy-incoming-shelling

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-osce-films-use-of-artillery-by-government-forces-and

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-24hours-in-ato-militants-49-times-fired-at-the-positions

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-up-to-2000-civilians-have-been-killed-in-the-ukraine

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-we-not-an-increase-in-casualties-over-the-past-3

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-our-report-marks-2-years-since-russia-extended-its

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-i-urge-supreme-court-of-russia-to-abandon-decision

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-respect-for-human-rights-in-the-occupied-areas-of

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-armed-groups-keep-denying-access-to-intl-orgs-to-persons

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-wo-secure-environment-of-course-there-cant-be-any

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-night-shelling-of-ukrainian-positions-by-russian-forces

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-uaf-shot-down-enemy-drone-near-sievierodonetsk

http://liveuamap.com/en/2016/3-june-in-maryinka-several-buildings-hit-in-the-night-shelling

http://europe.liveuamap.com/en/2016/2-june-the-first-two-gurzam-p58155-small-armored-artillery

Claim: NATO is a threat to Russia

Fact: NATO has reached out to Russia consistently, transparently and publicly over the past 25 years.

The Alliance has created unique cooperation bodies – the Permanent Joint Council and the NATO-Russia Council – to embody its relationship with Russia. It has invited Russia to cooperate on missile defence, an invitation extended to no other partner.

In the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security, agreed with Russia in 1997 and reaffirmed at NATO-Russia summits in Rome in 2002 and in Lisbon in 2010, NATO stated that "in the current and foreseeable security environment, the Alliance will carry out its collective defence and other missions by ensuring the necessary interoperability, integration, and capability for reinforcement rather than by additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces". The Alliance has fulfilled all such commitments.

NATO's official policy towards Russia was most recently articulated by the heads of state and government of the Alliance at the Wales Summit in September 2014.

They stated that "the Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia. But we cannot and will not compromise on the principles on which our Alliance and security in Europe and North America rest." (The Wales Summit Declaration can be read here http://www.nato.int/cps/en/nat....

Thus, neither the Alliance's policies nor its actions are a threat to Russia.

Claim: NATO missile defence targets Russia and the Iran agreement proves it

Fact: NATO's missile defence system is not designed or directed against Russia. It does not pose a threat to Russia's strategic deterrent. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/...

As already explained by NATO Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow, geography and physics make it impossible for the NATO system to shoot down Russian intercontinental missiles from NATO sites in Romania or Poland. Their capabilities are too limited, their planned numbers too few, and their locations too far south or too close to Russia to do so.

Russian officials have confirmed that the planned NATO shield will not, in fact, undermine Russia's deterrent. Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, Russia's missile defence envoy, said on January 26, 2015, that "neither the current, nor even the projected" missile defence system "could stop or cast doubt on Russia's strategic missile potential." http://www.themoscowtimes.com/...

Finally, the Russian claim that the framework agreement on Iran's nuclear programme obviates the need for NATO missile defence is wrong on two counts.

The Iranian agreement does not cover the proliferation of ballistic-missile technology which is an issue completely different from nuclear questions.

Furthermore, NATO has repeatedly made clear that missile defence is not about any one country, but about the threat posed by proliferation more generally. In fact, over 30 countries have obtained, or are trying to obtain, ballistic missile technology. The Iran framework agreement does not change those facts.

Claim: The accession of new Allies to NATO threatens Russia

Fact: Every country which joins NATO undertakes to uphold the principles and policies of the Alliance, and the commitments which NATO has already made.

This includes the commitment that NATO poses no threat to Russia, as most recently stated at the Wales Summit.

Therefore, as the number of countries which join NATO grows, so does the number of countries which agree that "the Alliance does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia."

Claim: NATO exercises are a provocation which threatens Russia

Fact: Every nation has the right to conduct exercises, as long as they do so within their international obligations, including notifying the actual numbers and providing observation opportunities when required.

In order to promote mutual trust and transparency, OSCE members are bound by the Vienna Document to inform one another in advance of exercises which include more than 9,000 troops, unless the exercises are snap tests of readiness.

NATO and Allies have consistently stood by the terms and the spirit of the Vienna Document. Those exercises which crossed the notification threshold were announced well in advance. This is why Russia could send observers to the UK-led Exercise Joint Warrior in April 2015.

Russia, on the other hand, has repeatedly called snap exercises including tens of thousands of troops, with some of them taking place close to NATO territory. This practice of calling massive exercises without warning is a breach of the spirit of the Vienna Document, raising tension and undermining trust. This is especially the case because Russia's military takeover of Crimea was masked by exactly such a snap exercise.

It is therefore Russia's exercises, not NATO's, which are a threat to stability.

http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm)
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/nato-missile-defense-is-no-threat-to-russia/489487.html
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article.php?id=514884

Ministry of Defense of Russia. is the BIGGEST liers in the world...

if their lips are moving they are lying.......Russia is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.” Now that makes sense..

Aleksey L Nikolov (Managing Director of Russia Today), told in a interviewed once to western media when asked.. What does Russia Today stand for and what is the Russian point of view?...

He answered ...“Oh, there is always a Russian point of view,” then he answered. “Take a banana. For someone it’s food. For someone else it’s a weapon. For a racist it’s something to tease a black person with.”

And there you have it: Russia’s opportunistic foreign policy, all wrapped up in a banana metaphor.

Thus the Kremlin and Russians preaches non-intervention and sovereignty while defending Assad, yet uses the reverse position to justify the invasion of Georgia and annexation of Crimea. Thus it warns against American exceptionalism while claiming that Russia has a special mission to rule over and enlighten its “near abroad.” The Russian point of view is anything the Kremlin and the Russians wants it to be.

When it comes to Ukraine, disseminating “a Russian point of view” has increasingly meant helping Russian military and intelligence operations. For example, after Moscow-supported rebels in East Ukraine shot down a Malaysian Airlines jet in July, the Boris and Olga's the average russians like to puck out a multitude of conspiracy theories (from claims that the real target of the attack was Putin’s personal plane to assertions that Ukrainian fighter jets were behind the tragedy), in order to direct attention away from the real perpetrators the Russians them selfs !!!

RUSSIA DID NOT LIBERATE OR WIN ANYTIHNG IN WW2

1. The scum that is RuSSians just like the nazis scum STARTED WW2 together by invading poland in 1939..

2. When hitler in 1941 attacked the USSR the RuSSian scum came running to the west and Britain like scared Little boys that needed help form the lokal school bully.. Also a fact the west and Europe was figting hitler for 2 years before your evil USSR even came into the war as Europe was fighting hitler in 1939 and USSR did not come to our side before 1941..

3. when in 1945 you was moving west with the USSR army you did not liberate you kicked out an evil regime and then you put in you own evil regime that is ocupation NOT libartion ...

4. Hitler gained a great deal from the HELP THE USSR GAVE ALL WHAT HITLER NEEDED TO BUILD UPÅ HIS ARMY THE . Soviet Union was supplying him with his raw materials. Provision was made for the supply from Russia of a million tons of grain for cattle, 900,000 tons of mineral oil, 100,000 tons of cotton, 500,000 tons of phosphates, 100,000 tons of chrome ore, 500,000 tons of iron ore, 300,000 tons of scrap iron and pig iron, and numerous other commodities vital to the German war effort. and all this when inside of the ruSSian controlled USSR other nations like Ukriane, Moldova,Georgia people was starving in extreme poverty...

While Hitler was fighting Britain and France, the Soviet Union was supplying him with his raw materials. Not only that, but they were helping Hitler to break Britain's blockade by supplying rubber and other essential supplies by transporting them on the Trans-Siberian Railway. It is interesting to note that while Stalin was supplying Hitler with thousands of tons of grain, his own people were starving.

5. #### RUSSIAS STALIN ANG HITLER STARTING INVEDING POLAND TOGETHER IN 1939

Poland (1939 Invasion of Poland and Bessarabia invasion of Poland together with Germany

(World War II)

Invasion and occupation Baltic states (1940–1991)

invasion and occupation Finnish territories (1940)

Invasion and occupation Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina (1940)

Invasion and occupation Northern Iran 1941–1946

Invasion and occupation Hungary (1944)

invasion and occupation Romania (1944)

Invasion and occupation Bulgaria (1944)

Invasion and occupation Czechoslovakia (1944)

Invasion and occupation Northern Norway 1944–1946 / Bornholm 1945–1946

### OCCUPATION AFTER WW2 Occupation after ww2

Invasion and occupation Germany (1945)

Invasion and occupation Austria 1945–1955

Invasion and occupation Manchuria 1945–1946

Invasion and occupation Korea 1945–1948

Invasion and occupation Czechoslovakia (1968–1989)

Invasion and occupation Afghanistan 1979–1989

AND ONE CAN ALSO SAY THAT Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia and other was also under occupation a political occupation and hegemony control by moscow

puppets that was holding those nation's inside moscow’s hegemony control and dominance...

YOU NEED TO STOP READING THE RUSSIAN PROPGANDA VERSION OF WW2 THE USA SAVED RUSSIA NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND

Russia’s Life-Saver: Lend-Lease Aid to the U.S.S.R. in World War II clear case that the program was a major factor in the survival of the Soviet Union and the victoryoverNazism. A well kwoen Russian historian says ... The Importance of Lend-Lease cannot be overestimated with out the USA the USSR will never driven Hitler out of Russia..

The importance of economic cooperation with the U.S., UK and Canada cannot be overestimated. According to the dollar rate of 2003, the inflation-adjusted value of these supplies amounted to $130 billion. These supplies were critical in some key areas. For example, in the beginning of 1942, Western tanks fully replenished Soviet losses, and exceeded them by three times. About 15 percent of the aircraft used by Soviet air forces were supplied by Allies, including the Airacobra fighter and Boston bomber. The Allies supplied 15,000 state-of-the-art machines at that time; for example, famous Soviet ace Alexander Pokryshkin flew Airacobra, as did the rest of his squadron. He shot down 59 enemy aircraft, and 48 of them were thanks to American military equipment.

With major agricultural regions of the Soviet Union under enemy occupation, and the unsatisfactory system of distribution and transportation, to say nothing of mismanagement, the Soviet state had more than a nodding acquaintance with famine. Without Western aid, during the war the Soviet population would have been in danger of sharing the fate of those trapped in Leningrad and the earlier victims of collectivization. Even with the American aid, many Russians died from lack of food. Equally important was Lend-Lease’s contribution to transportation. It would have been impossible for the Red Army to move the masses of troops and supplies on the primitive roads to the front lines without American Studebaker trucks, which also served as the launching pads for the dreaded Soviet rocket artillery.

Besides weaponry and food, Lend-Lease provided the Soviet Union with other resources, ranging from clothing to metals. With the start of the Cold War, Lend-Lease became a forgotten chapter in Soviet history and was only revived after glasnost. Now, thanks to Russian researchers and this excellent study, the West will have access to the real story. Lend-Lease provided vital help for the Soviet Union when the country was in desperate straits and made a significant contribution to the final victory. It also strengthened Josef Stalin, a fact that did not bother its chief architect, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who saw beyond the Allied victory and looked at Stalin as a counterbalance to the European colonial powers.

http://www.historynet.com/russias-life-saver-lend-lease-aid-to-the-ussr-in-world-war-ii-book-review.htm

http://www.rbth.com/business/2015/05/08/allies_gave_soviets_130_billion_under_lend-lease_45879.html

Massive American Aid Has Helped Russians Three Times in the Last Century..

Under the bland title of the Lend-Lease Act, American taxpayers sent to the Soviet people, from 1941 to 1945, $11.3 billion worth of war supplies. That is $146 billion in contemporary dollars.

This steel river of jeeps, trucks and bombers was neither a loan nor a lease. Franklin Roosevelt chose that title in the hopes of deluding American isolationists who opposed what they saw (correctly) as an outright gift to Moscow.

What did this money buy for the USSR? 3,770 bombers, 11,594 fighter planes, 5,980 anti-aircraft guns, 2,000 railroad locomotives, 51,000 jeeps, 361,000 trucks, 56,445 field telephones, 600,000 kilometers of telephone wire, 22 million artillery shells, almost one billion rifle cartridges, and 15 million pairs of army boots.

Shipped through the North Atlantic, driven up through Persia, or flown in from Alaska, this ready-made war material also freed up 600,000 Soviet factory workers to directly fight the Naziinvaders.

http://www.blogs.voanews.com/russia-watch/2012/09/25/making-the-kremlin-queasy-massive-american-aid-has-helped-russians-three-times-in-the-last-century/

Nieuws:

Palestina-Palestine and israel

Newest additions here !

Aliexpress

Informnapalm

UAWIRE

Aliexpress

Aliexpress

Auteur Topic: Oorlog Rusland 3 juni (gelezen 3244 keer)

admin

Oorlog Rusland 3 juni

Oorlog Rusland tegen Ukraine, Europa

Be self sufficient