• Welcome to Het Forum van NL _ Ukraine , Foreign News.
 

News:


Need  BEST website hosting?

We have the best offer, incl. discount if you refer thru US

after 14 years at Servage, 2 bad years at loopia/websupport.se
 we're now finally on Hostinger

Main Menu

Different links

Started by webmaster, November 19, 2023, 21:07:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

webmaster

#22
April 21, 2024, 09:16:56 AM

https://vk.com/wall-175747626_145601

"Human-shaped HIPPIES" EXERCISED AGGRESSION THREE MORE OFTEN AS COMMON CHIMPANZEES

French and American zoologists analyzed thousands of hours of observation of the aggressive behavior of adult male chimpanzees and bonobos in the wild. Quantitative comparison results, asThe authors note that they were surprised.

A person, studying the aggression of his species, is forced to observe his closest relatives - the apes chimpanzees and bonobos. Anthropologists and primatologists often look at the behavior of these primates from the perspective of the evolution of war and conflict. The scientific community now knows that there are many differences in the behavior of these primates.

It is known that males of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) are capable of killing their relatives in conflicts, but such cruelty has not been recorded among bonobos (Pan paniscus). Because of their peacefulness - including towards strangers - bonobos are called "hippie monkeys", and popular books by primatologist Frans de Waal have given them the "make love, not war" message.

Also, these species have different hierarchies: males of common chimpanzees often force females to have sexual intercourse, while in bonobos females dominate, and male aggression towards them is less common. However, the quantitative difference in aggressive behavior between the two species has not previously been studied.

A team of researchers from the United States and France decided to compare the level of male aggression in the bonobo communities in Kokolopori Nature Reserve in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and chimpanzees in Gombe National Park in Tanzania. Based on 14 years of observations of primates under the age of 12, the authors calculated the number of their aggressive actions - both contact (hitting, biting, etc.) and non-contact (for example, chasing). The results of the scientific work were published in the journal Current Biology.

During 2047 hours of observation of 12 male bonobos, zoologists recorded 521 manifestations of aggression, 77 (14.8%) of which were contact. And 14 male chimpanzees performed 654 aggressive actions over 7309 hours, of which 99 (15.1%) were contact actions.

The authors concluded that male bonobos exhibited aggressive behavior three times more often than chimpanzees. Moreover, most often, conflicts occurred only between males, while in chimpanzees, on the contrary, it was the females who suffered more often. Also, male common chimpanzees more often showed coalition aggression, uniting against common competitors.

The model of conflicts among bonobos was structured differently: these were skirmishes, where everyone was for himself, and often it was the females who showed aggression towards the males, this is how their communities are structured. Nevertheless, males who occupied a dominant position among competitors achieved greater reproductive success than others - in this they are similar to chimpanzees.

One possible reason why male bonobos showed aggression significantly more frequently than chimpanzees may be due to the different nature of aggression between the two closely related species. Common chimpanzees have something of the human practice of war and power struggle. For example, squads of their males can leave the camp for a long time to monitor and attack the males of another group of chimpanzees, followed by theft of their females. During an "internal political" struggle, the former leader of a chimpanzee group may be killed by competitors. It has been documented that winning males castrate losing males and then kill and eat them.

Bonobos do not kill their relatives (at least they are not recorded). Thus, in them, the aggression of one male towards another is rather of a demonstration nature. There is no risk of them being castrated, killed or eaten if they become aggressive, which may lower the threshold for violence in their environment compared to ordinary chimpanzees.

webmaster

#23
May 11, 2024, 14:12:05 PM
Goddess Isishttps://vk.com/wall-38519132_61045

Why did the Egyptians worship the goddess Isis? As Ivan Rak tells in the book "Myths of Ancient Egypt," Isis was the goddess of motherhood, fertility, water, wind, magic, and wisdom. She was considered the patroness of the dead and was the mother of all pharaohs. According to myths, Isis, like Osiris,was the daughter of the god Geb and the goddess Nut. The economic life of Ancient Egypt depended on river floods. According to legend, Isis loved her husband Osiris. When Set killed him and scattered his body to different parts of the world, the grieving Isis began to shed tears. This is how the first flood of the Nile occurred. The name of the goddess means 'throne', so Isis was often depicted with a headdress that resembled him in shape. Another appearance of the deity is a beautiful woman with the wings of a bird. She is often shown kneeling. Isis was highly revered in Ancient Egypt. From there, her cult spread to other parts of the world, including the Roman Empire and Greece. In Rome, she was often depicted with a baby in her arms, symbolizing her connection with motherhood and childhood.


https://archaeology-world.com/blue-eyed-humans-have-a-single-common-ancestor/

webmaster

#24
May 13, 2024, 07:21:14 AM
https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/scientists-map-the-lost-atlantis-continent-that-lies-off-australia


https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/rivers-oceans/the-gulf-stream-stopped-pumping-nutrients-during-the-last-ice-age-and-the-same-could-be-happening-now
------------------

https://newsinstact.com/the-mystery-of-orio%CE%B7-why-are-so-ma%CE%B7y-a%CE%B7cie%CE%B7t-megalithic-structures-orie%CE%B7ted-towards-orio%CE%B7/19251/

WHO BECAME THE VICTIM OF THE MOST MASSIVE GENOCIDE IN WORLD HISTORY?

"I have become death,
the Destroyer of Worlds."
(Bhagavad Gita)

Robert Oppenheimer remembered these lines when he saw the first atomic explosion. With much greater right, the ominous words of the ancient Sanskrit poem could be recalled by the people who were on the ships Niña, Pinta and Santa Maria, when 450 years before the Explosion, on the same dark early morning they noticed a fire on the leeward side of the island, which they later named in honor of the Saint Savior - San Salvador.

Twenty-six days after testing a nuclear device in the New Mexico desert, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima killed at least 130,000 people, almost all of them civilians. In just 21 years after Columbus landed on the islands of the Caribbean, the largest of them, renamed Hispaniola by the Admiral (present-day Haiti and the Dominican Republic), lost almost all of its indigenous population - about 8 million people, killed, died from disease, hunger, slavery labor and despair. The devastating power of this Spanish "nuclear bomb" on Hispaniola was equivalent to more than 50 Hiroshima-type atomic bombs. And that was just the beginning.

Thus, a historian from the University of Hawaii, David Stanard, begins his book "The American Holocaust" (1992) by comparing the first and "most monstrous in terms of size and consequences of genocide in world history" with the practice of genocides in the 20th century, and in this historical perspective lies, in my opinion view, the special significance of his work, as well as the significance of Ward Churchill's subsequent book, A Minor Question of Genocide (1997), and a number of other studies in recent years. In these works, the destruction of the indigenous population of the Americas by Europeans and Latinos appears not only as the most massive and prolonged (up to this day) genocide in world history, but also as an organic part of Euro-American civilization from the late Middle Ages to Western imperialism of our days.

Stanard begins his book by describing the amazing richness and variety of human life in the Americas before Columbus's fateful voyage. He then takes the reader along the historical and geographical route of genocide: from the extermination of the indigenous inhabitants of the Caribbean, Mexico, Central and South America, to the turn north and the destruction of Indians in Florida, Virginia and New England, and finally through the Great Prairies and the Southwest to California and the Pacific Coast of the Northwest. The following part of my article is based primarily on Stanard's book, while the second part, genocide in North America, uses Churchill's work.

The human society destroyed by the Europeans in the Caribbean was in every respect superior to their own, if closeness to the ideal of a communist society is taken as a measure of development. It would be more accurate to say that, thanks to a rare combination of natural conditions, the Tainos (or Arawaks) lived in a communist society. Not the way the European Marx imagined it, but communist nonetheless. Residents of the Greater Antilles have reached a high level in regulating their relationships with the natural world. They learned to get from nature everything they needed, not by depleting it, but by cultivating and transforming it. They had huge aqua farms, in each of which they raised up to a thousand large sea turtles (the equivalent of 100 head of cattle). They literally "collected" small fish from the sea, using plant substances that paralyzed them. Their agriculture was superior to that of Europe and was based on a three-tier planting system that uses combinations of different plant types to create a favorable soil and climate regime. Their homes, spacious, clean and bright, would be the envy of the European masses.

American geographer Karl Sauer comes to the following conclusion:

"The tropical idyll that we find in the descriptions of Columbus and Peter Martyr was basically true." About Tainos (Arawak): "These people did not need anything. They took care of their plants and were skilled fishermen, canoeists and swimmers. They built attractive homes and kept them clean. Aesthetically, they expressed themselves in wood. They had free time to play ball, dance and play music. They lived in peace and friendship." (Standard, 51).

But Columbus, that typical European of the 15th and 16th centuries, had a different idea of ​​the "good society." On October 12, 1492, the day of "Contact," he wrote in his diary:
"These people walk in what their mother gave birth to, but are good-natured ... they can be made free and converted to our Holy Faith. They will make good and skillful servants."

That day, representatives of the two continents met for the first time on an island that the locals called Guanahani. Early in the morning, a crowd of curious Tainos gathered under the tall pines on the sandy shore. They watched as a strange boat with a hull like a fish skeleton and bearded strangers in it swam to the shore and buried itself in the sand. Bearded men came out and pulled her higher, away from the foam of the surf. Now they stood opposite each other. The newcomers were dark-skinned and black-haired, with shaggy heads and overgrown beards, and many of their faces were riddled with smallpox, one of the 60 to 70 deadly diseases they would bring to the Western Hemisphere. There was a heavy smell coming from them. In Europe in the 15th century, people did not wash. At a temperature of 30-35 degrees Celsius, the aliens were dressed from head to toe, with metal armor hanging over their clothes. In their hands they held long thin knives, daggers and sticks sparkling in the sun.

In his logbook, Columbus often noted the amazing beauty of the islands and their inhabitants - friendly, happy, peaceful. And just two days after the first contact, an ominous entry appears in the journal: "50 soldiers are enough to conquer them all and force them to do whatever we want." "The locals allow us to go wherever we want and give us everything we ask from them." What surprised the Europeans most was the incomprehensible generosity of this people. And this is not surprising. Columbus and his comrades sailed to these islands from the real hell that was Europe at that time. They were the real fiends (and in many ways the scum) of the European hell, over which the bloody dawn of primitive capitalist accumulation rose. (Read what Europe was like at the link http://vk.com/history_repeats?w=wall-59740949_19956 )

"When the white masters came to our land, they brought fear and withering flowers. They disfigured and destroyed the color of other nations... Marauders by day, criminals by night, murderers of the world." Mayan book Chilam Balam.

Stanard and Churchill spend many pages describing the conspiracy of the Euro-American scientific establishment to conceal the true population of the American continent in the pre-Columbian era. The Smithsonian Institution in Washington was and continues to be at the head of this conspiracy. And Ward Churchill also talks in detail about the resistance that American Zionist scientists, specializing in the so-called strategic area for the ideology of modern imperialism. "Holocaust", i.e. of the Nazi genocide against European Jews, have contributed to the attempts of progressive historians to establish the actual scale and world-historical significance of the genocide of Native Americans at the hands of "Western civilization." As for the flagship of official American science, the Smithsonian Institution, until very recently, promoted as "scientific" estimates of the pre-Columbian population made in the 19th and early 20th centuries by racist anthropologists like James Mooney, according to which no more than 1 100,000 people. Only in the post-war period, the use of agricultural analysis methods made it possible to establish that the population density there was an order of magnitude higher, and that back in the 17th century, for example, on the island of Martha's Vineyard, now a resort site for the richest and most influential Euro-Americans, 3 thousand Indians lived. By the mid-60s. estimates of the indigenous population north of the Rio Grande had risen to at least 12.5 million by the time of the European invasion. In the Great Lakes region alone, by 1492, up to 3.8 million lived, and in the basin of the Mississippi and its main tributaries - up to 5.25. In the 80s new research has shown that the population of pre-Columbian North America may have been as high as 18.5, and the entire hemisphere as high as 112 million (Dobyns). Based on these studies, Cherokee demographer Russell Thornton made calculations to determine how many people did and did not live in North America. His conclusion: at least 9-12.5 million. Recently, many historians have taken as the norm the average between the calculations of Dobyns and Thornton, i.e. 15 million as the most likely approximate number of indigenous people in North America. In other words, the population of this continent was about fifteen times higher than what the Smithsonian Institution claimed back in the 1980s, and seven and a half times higher than what it is willing to admit today. Moreover, calculations close to those carried out by Dobyns and Thornton were known already in the mid-19th century, but they were ignored as ideologically unacceptable, contradicting the central myth of the conquerors about the supposedly "primordial", "desert" continent, which was just waiting for them to populate it .

Based on modern data, it can be said that when Christopher Columbus landed on one of the islands of the continent soon called the "New World," on October 12, 1492, its population was between 100 and 145 million people (Standard). Two centuries later it had declined by 90%. To this day, the most "lucky" of the once existing peoples of both Americas have retained no more than 5% of their former numbers. In terms of its size and duration (to this day), the genocide of the indigenous population of the Western Hemisphere has no parallel in world history.

So on Hispaniola, where until 1492 about 8 million Tainos flourished, by 1570 there were only two miserable villages of the island's indigenous inhabitants, about which 80 years ago Columbus wrote that "there are no better and more kind people in the world."

To be continued... Stay tuned!
https://vk.com/wall-59740949_968883


Attached is an engraving by Theodore de Bry, "The Punishment of the Indians of America", 1552.
https://sun6-20.userapi.com/impg/9Heglk0wd8_Nrq9yt0uKrRBoC3_SyTLfWQZu5Q/Ja5-8TVFZMw.jpg?size=791x645&quality=95&sign=da39493ca369bce64311d33ac65c1b98&c_uniq_tag=5i8VlfbiAJ9UXa8ulDwWhGLn1_EVBrs53MQxvZbfDOs&type=album

webmaster

#28
July 05, 2024, 10:51:28 AM
https://www.bright.nl/nieuws/1208834/thuisbatterij-homewizard-slaat-zonne-stroom-op-sluit-je-zelf-aan-op-stopcontact.html


700 jaar groeiende ongelijkheid: Imperium Assyrie, Ongelijkheid groeide in historisch rijk: De armen werden steeds armer | lijkt wel Nederland onder Rutte en BAK ellende
https://historianet.nl/maatschappij/ongelijkheid-groeide-in-historisch-rijk-de-armen-werden-steeds-armer

https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/geen-toezicht-op-geheime-diensten-mogelijk?&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ControleGeheimeDiensten

https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/chipshol-nog-altijd-met-geheimzinnigheid-omgeven?utm_source=nieuwsbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Schipholgrond&utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Hoe++complot-grond++bij+Schiphol+miljoenen+waard+wordt&utm_campaign=Nieuwsbrief+Ties+NIET-LEDEN+14-06-2024

https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/transactiemonitoring-banken-illegaal?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=TMNLillegaal


https://waarzitwatin.nl/?utm_source=margriet&utm_medium=branded_content&utm_campaign=huishoudelijke-producten

https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/de-toekomst-van-tennet?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=TenneTverkoop

https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/wet-gegevensverwerking-schaadt-privacy?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=NieuweDatawet

https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/klimaat-kan-maximaal-5-kledingstukken-per-jaar-aan?utm_source=nieuwsbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VijfKledingstukken

https://www.bnnvara.nl/kassa/artikelen/hoe-kun-je-terugleverkosten-beperken-als-bezitter-van-zonnepanelen

webmaster

#31
August 17, 2024, 16:53:39 PM


https://x.com/riss1130/status/1822473954306428931
🌟 First discovered in 1973, #Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize in 2015. What makes this drug so extraordinary? After watching the excellent video, ask yourself why the #FDA and #CDC trashed miraculous drug? Why prevent doctors from using it to save lives?

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1822471472444534952
ghb
If you thought what they did to ivermectin was bad, wait till you hear what they did to this drug.

It turns out that there's a cure to insomnia, but the drug is so remarkably effective for a variety of conditions that the FDA colluded with the media to take it down.

The drug is Gamma-hydroxybutyrate, also known as GHB.

The FDA's tactics were ruthless. In 1990, they issued a press release filled with deceptive inaccuracies. They banned it, threatened compounding pharmacies, and even raided suppliers without legal authority.

"The media hysteria labeled it a 'date rape drug,'" as noted by
@MidwesternDoc
, but evidence shows GHB wasn't a major cause of assaults.

If you don't believe me, watch this video with
@Jimmy_Dore
 and be ready to have your mind blown.
 
 https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-isnt-there-a-cure-for-insomnia
 

webmaster

#32
October 20, 2024, 17:14:21 PM

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/interactive-map-shows-you-what-indigenous-land-you-live-on-180980920/

?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_term=10142024&utm_content=archival&fbclid=IwY2xjawF7koFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHSipixMn75P3ttjkzb7TZh2D7MLP-6FgCYnMbQCLQpyBLrKYHCFCPqB86Q_aem_3EODcNLoZeQFvgsDKuvkIw


----------------

webmaster

#33
October 27, 2024, 10:16:03 AM

Ok , lets take 2 situations a bit sci-fi but still: a virus or whatever kills all males but doesn't effect their frozen sperm, so takes a time, generally 9 months smile-emoticon but then a new male population is born...., virus has died out ofc, so woman can't for a year of 20 complain about men, they're too busy working, raising up the kids, so first new males marry lets say after 25-30 years... Second situation: a virus kills all females but doesn't effect their eggs..then..ehhh mankind will die out... so there's the reason in ancient times sun& mothergoddesses were worshipped...for at least 300.000 years

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/sculpture-controlled-live-honeybees-180960006/

https://www.sciencealert.com/earths-flipping-magnetic-field-heard-as-sound-is-an-unforgettable-horror

https://www.thedailystar.net/life-living/news/fabled-dhakai-muslin-revived-2978296
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210316-the-legendary-fabric-that-no-one-knows-how-to-make

webmaster

#34
November 03, 2024, 09:52:21 AM
Older people.
Before Homo Sapiens, Homo Naledi buried his dead and created cave drawings 100,000 years ago. Homo Naleda, one of the extinct species of human cousins, exhibited sophisticated activities including body burial and wall art on caves. It was formerly believed that only humans and neanderthals, with higher brain capacity, engaged in these activities. 2013 saw scientists discover Homo naledi fossils in Rising Star, a cave system in South Africa. The bones were found to be purposefully buried in a certain manner, with the bodies crowded together and covered with dirt. At least 100,000 years older than any funeral carried out by mankind, these ones are far more ancient! Researchers also discovered estimated 241,000 to 335,000 year old engravings on the walls of the caverns. Early humans and neanderthal records were supposed to be utilized for communication of knowledge. This implies, particularly with regard to mortality, Homo naledi had his own methods of interpreting symbols and giving objects significance. These findings inform us that sophisticated behavioral and symbolic activities were not exclusive to contemporary people. They might have also existed among our prehistoric forebears. This begs issues regarding the beginning of these actions and whether our greater brain capacity is truly what drives our advanced state.

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100083179672668


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_oarfish

webmaster

#35
November 10, 2024, 13:23:40 PM


THE GOMO NALEDI BURIES HIS DEAD
This animal lived 100,000 years before us.
In 2013, scientists made one of the most astonishing discoveries in the history of human evolution when they uncovered Homo Naledi fossils in South Africa's Rising Star cave system. This species, which existed between 241,000 and 335,000 years ago, calls into question long-held beliefs about the habits of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals. With substantially smaller brains, species such as Homo Naledi were assumed to lack the cognitive abilities required to undertake complicated behaviors. However, archeological evidence has emerged to suggest differently.
Homo naledi did not just bury his dead; he did so with meticulous care. The victims were intentionally laid in a fetal posture, curled up, and buried in soil, a symbolic act that has perplexed scientists because it is much older than any previous known burial. These burials are at least 100,000 years older than any living human!
Even more remarkable was the discovery of carvings on the cave walls themselves. These engravings, which could be as old as 335,000 years, are similar to the oldest examples of Neanderthal and Homo sapiens rock art. These symbols were thought to be utilized for communicating ideas or storing data.
If Homo naledi accomplished anything similar, he may have had his own symbolic system for understanding his surroundings, particularly when it came to funeral ceremonies.
This study calls into question the notion that a larger brain is necessary for sophisticated activities. Homo Naledi, with an orange-sized brain, appears to have acquired sophisticated cultural practices much earlier than we could have expected.
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid02xDvvyHMpMNoMLrRKyNqLKChTYZqDdrBrGEKcGA3Aos6fBEQNd4ecgYPLwUEuvvYbl&id=100083179672668&__cft__
  • =AZWqhze3SjIupmbK7KNzBuckx7K8Imb2NmSeReeuU-BRb6HVKt6saGj7RrCA_tAMMzvoRh-PUSBj5K8vdF-2mYkDqinbb26ybh57vdkzWuroMX9BaS91JDGWtndpzRA7PbxL2kbcOUvNlKuuDyuPeUAGWlqdKgnQrWwl2DR_gRBp6oP3hscDboSmPZDfJQOvQ8qeHLyjeYaesR3dep2-dXzS1K7bLMKzFXR5OSic5umT3exGPvWVNpzYvuyj-z0AQjA&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R


Neanderthals became extinct around 40,000 years ago. Hypotheses on the causes of the extinction include violence, transmission of diseases from modern humans which Neanderthals had no immunity to, competitive replacement, extinction by interbreeding with early modern human populations, natural catastrophes, climate change and inbreeding depression. It is likely that multiple factors caused the demise of an already low population.
In research published in Nature in 2014, an analysis of radiocarbon dates from forty Neanderthal sites from Spain to Russia found that the Neanderthals disappeared in Europe between 41,000 and 39,000 years ago with 95% probability. The study also found with the same probability that modern humans and Neanderthals overlapped in Europe for between 2,600 and 5,400 years. Modern humans reached Europe between 45,000 and 43,000 years ago. Improved radiocarbon dating published in 2015 indicates that Neanderthals disappeared around 40,000 years ago, which overturns older carbon dating which indicated that Neanderthals may have lived as recently as 24,000 years ago, including in refugia on the south coast of the Iberian peninsula such as Gorham's Cave. Zilhão et al. (2017) argue for pushing this date forward by some 3,000 years, to 37,000 years ago. Inter-stratification of Neanderthal and modern human remains has been suggested, but is disputed. Stone tools that have been proposed to be linked to Neanderthals have been found at Byzovya (ru:Бызовая) in the polar Urals, and dated to 31,000 to 34,000 years ago, but is also disputed. At Mandrin Cave the French palaeolontologist Ludovic Slimak [fr] and colleagues developed a new method of analysing soot from fires. They were able to distinguish between fires made by Neanderthals and modern humans based on the differing food residues in the soot as a result of their different diets. The researchers found that the last layer of soot from Neanderthal fires was a year or less before the first made by modern humans, and in Slimak's view this shows that the two species met and supports the hypothesis that the Neanderthals disappeared due to competitive replacement.
Slight competitive advantage on the part of modern humans may have accounted for Neanderthals' decline on a timescale of thousands of years.
Generally small and widely dispersed fossil sites suggest that Neanderthals lived in less numerous and socially more isolated groups than contemporary Homo sapiens. Tools such as Mousterian flint stone flakes and Levallois points are remarkably sophisticated from the outset, yet they have a slow rate of variability and general technological inertia is noticeable during the entire fossil period. Artifacts are of utilitarian nature, and symbolic behavioral traits are undocumented before the arrival of modern humans in Europe around 40,000 to 35,000 years ago.
The noticeable morphological differences in skull shape between the two human species also have cognitive implications. These include the Neanderthals' smaller parietal lobes and cerebellum, areas implicated in tool use, visuospatial integration, numeracy, creativity, and higher-order conceptualization. The differences, while slight, would have possibly been enough to affect natural selection and may underlie and explain the differences in social behaviors, technological innovation, and artistic output.
Jared Diamond, a supporter of competitive replacement, points out in his book The Third Chimpanzee that the replacement of Neanderthals by modern humans is comparable to patterns of behavior that occur whenever people with advanced technology clash with people with less developed technology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_extinction
map published by Berria

https://www.facebook.com/ToddAndrewPronovost/posts/pfbid0wfH6R9EU3SfFxQ7C6aCgDnAKgFpia4BsNkMfcCxdyUp3xaThUy9mkSGfcHzShdqkl?__cft__
  • =AZU6qo3NoAuPEjR1qW0dS-ekDYh9n1qq1M1v_jmsM5COmSWW9FnEXs3Be57sSwfs3ZtvMwTSsbAeQUZ8sv0BJJDdbn2J71lNh5sgzyhx-3GA7ha0rjhBGJcn97YJ27HoJ7DAcWn5y1p_sbhbnQUeqhvAt7KNHnbwuXRH9PG5e49n10OyMnIpFfhXTuABvipMxVklgFL3AsDfhCTBkpCFFu5l1up2Z14Yu0pbIdfjQHf4b7DKGJf9LrJTX44Qw0Iz28w&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R


https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/bison-in-canada-discover-ancient-petroglyphs-fulfilling-an-indigenous-prophecy-180979119/


Prehistoric Egypt and Predynastic Egypt was the period of time starting at the first human settlement and ending at the First Dynasty of Egypt around 3100 BC.
At the end of prehistory, "Predynastic Egypt" is traditionally defined as the period from the final part of the Neolithic period beginning c. 6200 BC to the end of the Naqada III period c. 3000 BC. The dates of the Predynastic period were first defined before widespread archaeological excavation of Egypt took place, and recent finds indicating a very gradual Predynastic development have led to controversy over when exactly the Predynastic period ended. Thus, various terms such as "Protodynastic period", "Zero Dynasty" or "Dynasty 0" are used to name the part of the period which might be characterized as Predynastic by some and Early Dynastic by others.
The Predynastic period is generally divided into cultural eras, each named after the place where a certain type of Egyptian settlement was first discovered. However, the same gradual development that characterizes the Protodynastic period is present throughout the entire Predynastic period, and individual "cultures" must not be interpreted as separate entities but as largely subjective divisions used to facilitate study of the entire period.
The vast majority of Predynastic archaeological finds have been in Upper Egypt, because the silt of the Nile River was more heavily deposited at the Delta region, completely burying most Delta sites long before modern times.
Egypt has been inhabited by humans (including archaic humans) for over a million (and probably over 2 million) years, though the evidence for early occupation of Egypt is sparse and fragmentary. The oldest archaeological finds in Egypt, stone tools belonging to the Oldowan industry, are poorly dated. These tools are succeeded by those belonging to the Acheulean industry. The youngest Achulean sites in Egypt date to around 400-300,000 years ago.
During the Late Pleistocene, when Egypt was occupied by modern humans, several archaeological industries are recognised including the Silsilian, Fakhurian, Afian, Kubbaniyan, Idfuan-Shuwikhatian, and the Isnan industries.
Some of the oldest known structures were discovered in Egypt by archaeologist Waldemar Chmielewski along the southern border near Wadi Halfa, Sudan, at the Arkin 8 site. Chmielewski dated the structures to 100,000 BC. The remains of the structures are oval depressions about 30 cm deep and 2 × 1 meters across. Many are lined with flat sandstone slabs which served as tent rings supporting a dome-like shelter of skins or brush. This type of dwelling provided a place to live, but if necessary, could be taken down easily and transported. They were mobile structures—easily disassembled, moved, and reassembled—providing hunter-gatherers with semi-permanent habitation.
Aterian tool-making reached Egypt c. 40,000 BC.
The Khormusan industry in Egypt began between 42,000 and 32,000 BP.[6] Khormusans developed tools not only from stone but also from animal bones and hematite.[6] They also developed small arrow heads resembling those of Native Americans,[6] but no bows have been found.[6] The end of the Khormusan industry came around 16,000 B.C. with the appearance of other cultures in the region, including the Gemaian.
The Late Paleolithic in Egypt started around 30,000 BC.[6] The Nazlet Khater skeleton was found in 1980 and given an age of 33,000 years in 1982, based on nine samples ranging between 35,100 and 30,360 years old.[8] This specimen is the only complete modern human skeleton so far found from the earliest Late Stone Age in Africa.[9]
The Fakhurian late Paleolithic industry in Upper Egypt, showed that a homogenous population existed in the Nile-Valley during the late Pleistocene. Studies of the skeletal material showed they were in the range of variation found in the Wadi Halfa, Jebel Sahaba and fragments from the Kom Ombo populations.
H.Seldon - This file was derived from: Ancient Egypt map.svg by Jeff Dahl The location of Faiyum Oasis was referenced from the book: Shaw, Ian , ed. (2003) Dějiny starověkého Egypta ISBN: 80-7257-975-4.
A map of Ancient Egypt with Faiyum Oasis highlighted.
https://www.facebook.com/ToddAndrewPronovost/posts/pfbid02nhyyiEZxDMpBhxcAkHALFM2isBS9tevnStktYCFF9ZeSM5qvDhVM56iYyqiyVjRYl?__cft__
  • =AZW2YbvqX5rATE60GKN7y8uaEQWYEJQiakLBiaF0SbfU0ox-dJwao9j2oj1LXQkwZ9SYIDNTtGS33VF9iYocls5A9hdqM0rIfNZ3KWuKyPjZrD6q8_pOqJSBEBC-lzpyEV6dzRQQJw1QsPwZYRLouluSXgQrBpT4bLM6SLT3ZuimLfUh48nwno4oPiQx1lChHqkp9Ph97Vc5ZudLXfaWXeHdqCfe7oePeV9arXGep-ovH_5b5mRgKMJ_8gvpN7xK8Mw&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R


webmaster

#36
November 28, 2024, 08:16:33 AM

https://vk.com/wall-165205956_231546

The real story behind the burqa

It would be good to remind those who wear the burqa – maybe they would dress differently

The burqa comes from the cult of Astarte in ancient Mesopotamia.

In honor of the goddess of carnal love, all women without exception had to engage in prostitution once a year in the sacred forests surrounding the goddess's temples.

In order not to be recognized, women of high society took to veiling themselves completely.

And do not forget that Mustafa Kemal, known as Ataturk, the first president of Turkey from 1923 to 1938, found the right way to shut up the fundamentalists of that time.

He ended the wearing of the burqa by issuing a simple law with immediate effect: all Turkish women have the right to dress as they wish. However, all prostitutes must wear the burqa.

The next day, the burqa was no longer seen in Turkey.

And this law is still in force.

"When Judah saw her, he took her for a harlot, because her face was covered" (Gen. 38:15)

webmaster

#37
December 20, 2024, 07:39:37 AM

--------
Temple of Life in India: A Bas-Relief That Baffles Scientists

India has a huge number of ancient cultural monuments. Most often, these are temples carved into rocks or built from blocks. However, the most ancient structures, which date back to the 4th millennium BC, are precisely the temples carved into rocks. They have nothing to do with religious buildings, but belong to the naturalistic culture, as evidenced by their decoration.
Archaeologists excavated one of these structures. First, they discovered a strange hill, and when they tried to "x-ray" it, they found out that there was a building hidden inside. The excavations lasted four years, and during this time they managed to clean the structure carved in sandstone. The age of the temple was estimated at 6 thousand years, which makes it one of the oldest in India.
But the bas-reliefs on the walls were especially surprising. They depicted the birth of life. The first scenes depicted men and women, and the second ones depicted the same women, but in the moment of intimacy. The bas-relief then amazed the imagination: the images accurately described the fusion of an egg cell with a sperm cell and the subsequent division of the formed cells. The bas-relief depicted all the phases of embryonic development, right up to a full-fledged fetus. The last scenes depicted a woman with a large belly and the process of giving birth.
And all this 6 thousand years ago, when, according to official science, microscopes did not exist, and at best there were magnifying glasses and, perhaps, mirrors. How then were the ancient Indians, if the temple and bas-reliefs were created by their hands, able to accurately depict the entire path of the origin of life, the development of the cell and embryo? For me, this is a mystery. For scientists, by the way, too.
The so-called genetic disk, an artifact made of lydite and almost 12 thousand years old, became widely known. On its surface there were several sectors separated from each other, each of which had images carved into the stone. Together, they carried approximately the same meaning: from sexual intercourse between two people to the birth of a child, the phases of cell and embryo development were depicted in detail. Finding themselves in a helpless position when trying to explain the origin of this object, scientists declared it a fake.
But in the case of the Indian temple, this could not be done. The structure is indeed ancient and was hidden from the eyes of people for centuries, if not thousands of years. However, no one can explain what technologies the ancient masters used to accurately identify and repeat the phases of cell division on the bas-relief. But this does not look like a random hit on the mark, but a purposeful transfer of knowledge.
Giving a special meaning to the place indicates its importance in the lives of ancient people. Perhaps pregnant women came here and had their births taken care of. There are even such assumptions that this temple was an analogue of a maternity hospital. That is, not only births took place here, but also preparation for them, perhaps diagnostics during pregnancy. Of course, not with the help of ultrasound machines, but with the help of some advanced ancient technologies. This is the task presented by the ancient structure in India.

https://vk.com/al_feed.php?w=wall-153756679_14482

webmaster

#38
December 24, 2024, 09:35:44 AM

Once a wise man was asked to explain the difference between religion and spirituality. His answer was profound:
There is not one religion, there are many.
Spirituality is one.
Religion is for those who sleep.
Spirituality is for those who are awake.
Religion is for those who need someone to tell them what to do and who want guidance.
Spirituality is for those who pay attention to their inner voice.
Religion has dogmatic rules.
Spirituality calls us to discuss everything, to question everything.
Religion threatens and frightens.
Spirituality gives inner peace.
Religion talks about sin and guilt.
Spirituality says, "learn from your mistakes."
Religion suppresses everything wrong.
Spirituality overcomes everything, it brings you closer to the truth!
Religion is about God; he is not God.
Spirituality is everything and therefore it is in God.
Religion invents.
Spirituality is an acquisition.
Religion does not tolerate any questions.
Spirituality will question everything.
Religion is humanity.
It is an organization whose rules are set by men.
Spirituality is divine, without human rules.
Religion is the cause of division
Spirituality unites
Religion Wants You to Believe
Spirituality: You Have to Seek It to Believe It
Religion follows the concepts of the holy book
Spirituality seeks parties in all books
Religion fuels fear
Spirituality feeds trust and faith
Religion lives in thoughts
Spirituality lives in the inner consciousness
Religion is about performing rituals
Spirituality is about the inner self
Religion feeds the ego
Spirituality makes you go further
Religion makes us disconnect from the world to follow God
Spirituality makes us live in God without giving up our present life
Religion is a sect
Spirituality is an inner meditation
Religion fills us with dreams of glory in heaven.
Spirituality makes us live in earthly glory and in heaven.
Religion lives in the past and the future.
Spirituality is life in the present.
Religion creates monasteries in our memory
Spirituality liberates our conscience
Religion makes us believe in eternal life
Spirituality gives us the awareness of eternal life
Religion promises life after death
Spirituality means finding God within us in our present life before we die We are not humans having a mental experience We are spiritual beings living a human experience
Benjamin Fulford
https://vk.com/wall-63628701_299814

Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions